![]() If your goal, however, is personal expression through content creation - or if you want to work around a more “artistic pirates” vibe in collaboration. ![]() And what you learn on one can be adapted to all the others. If your goal is to “fit in” to the existing industry standards as a seat editor in a large operation somewhere - learn one of the traditional approaches. ALL the others hold to the same basic timeline “tracks based” conventions used since NLEs were born. If this is how you prefer to edit - they are all fine tools.įCP BROKE with the conventions of NLE workflow design because it’s primary architect (the same guy who single handedly invented Premiere) saw that the media landscape was changing - and believed there were going to be better ways to enhance and advance editing tools.įCP is direct database-driven magnetic assembly editing. NLEs first simply tried to virtualize the mechanical processes of the day to keep things “comfortable” for the people using them.ĪVID, Premiere, Final Cut (before X) and eventually Resolve - all followed this path and are all structurally alike. It came out of traditional film and early broadcast techniques. I essentially edited one way for the first 30 years. Having made my living editing for 40 years now, this is my take. I’m just saying that the original post was inaccurate and misleading in saying “Davinci is relatively more user-friendly, however, Final Cut Pro has more amazing edit features”. I’m not saying that FCP isn’t amazing, again, FCP is my NLE of choice for the reasons you highlighted. This is just a small selection of amazing edit features that I wish FCP had. ![]() It has great collaborative editing features. Resolve has scene cut detection which I’ve found valuable for some edit projects I’ve done. I love how you can add motion blur to footage if you shoot it at a high frame rate. FCP has some of the best noise removal I’ve used, better than FCPs. Similar idea with when I want to hide a jump cut with what FCP calls a “flow” transition, resolves version looks way better. For example if I want to slow footage down beyond 24 fps and I want what FCP calls “optical flow” I’ve found that resolves version always looks better. But resolve often does certain things better. Well I think maybe you’re moving the goal post with the word unique. Which one do you think is the better one? Please share your thoughts too If you would like to read my own thoughts about these aspects more detailedly, you can check out my comparison guide here. Final Cut Pro has a ton of more rendering power.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |